Can a person be morally sound without recognizing religion?

Is it possible for a person to be morally just and a "good person" without believing in a/the god(s) or following an organized religion?

Posted By Jess on September 12, 2007

You can subscribe to this Debate if you log in.

About Jess

I'm a 24 year old Registered Nurse. :)

Top Enemies: none
From_the_east

No you are not a "sinner" if you are without a religion. But without on...

Posted By eastwind on September 14, 2007

Art_4

Humans instinctively know the difference between right and wrong, religi...

Posted By JenTheObscure on September 12, 2007

L_684f116ceb600ffaf044e0afa7831b0f

Religion is for people who can't make decisions for themselves

Posted By jhall85 on September 24, 2007

085_11

True, you can be a "good" person without religion. But who told you wha...

Posted By Kliflosises on September 14, 2007

Call For Backup

Invite others to join and support you in this debate. Or maybe you just want to pick a fight! Either way...

Call for backup now!

Yes, you don't have to be religious to be a good person!

L_684f116ceb600ffaf044e0afa7831b0f

Religion is for people who can't make decisions for themselves

-- Posted By jhall85 on September 24, 2007

I can easily tell you what is moral without consulting a religion because i can think for myself. It doesn't mean you will agree, but who is to say anyone agrees with your religion?

If it takes some omnipotent being who's existence will never be proven to dictate your actions and morals then you are a truly weak person that needs to re-evaluate your purpose to live. .

Henryclay

You can be good without religion, but religion allows your goodness to serve a different purpose.

-- Posted By Swryght on October 23, 2007

You can certainly be good without religion, whether you accidentally do what is good, or do so with intention. Without something to measure goodness against, however, The goodness serves no purpose.

People have different ideas about what goodness is, some of them focus on preservation of personal rights, economic efficiency, greater good for mankind, etc. Without some reason for being good, you can't sensibly say that you are good.

Religion provides a different definition of Goodness, involving something like salvation of the soul, realization of the true nature of reality, full understanding of the self, union with the Divine, and so on. .

If you do the things that allow you to achieve these goals, then you are being good in accordance with religion. The same applies to other moral systems. The point is, without a system, there is no basis to a%&^ss goodness.

Art_4

Humans instinctively know the difference between right and wrong, religion is about more than that.

-- Posted By JenTheObscure on September 12, 2007

Religion does not follow a well reasoned ethical system, ergo a person can be moral without religion.

Basically, religion isn't logically sound in any sense. Any moral system that is based upon an untenable position, i.e. God is certain to exist, is flawed. It is impossible to prove, or disprove, the existence of God.

Thereby, one can reason that a logically sound ethical system must be logically consistent. There are ethical systems that are sound that do not require the presence of God. Thus, a person can be moral and not believe in God.

A better question would be to say, "Can a person be truly moral and follow a specific religion?" .

A person does not have to be religious to be morally sound. According to the tenets of various faiths you have to be religious to be 'saved', but that's different from being moral. .

No, anyone who doesn't believe in God/religion/etc is a sinner.

085_11

True, you can be a "good" person without religion. But who told you what "good" is?

-- Posted By Kliflosises on September 14, 2007

If you claim that naturally everyone knows good from bad, then right there you suggest that something links our morality together. That denotes a superior being, and therefor validates the need for religion. A religion would regulate proper morals.

I learned what "good" was from our law system (don't kill, don't steal, etc) and what was "moral" from my parents (treat others with respect, give to those less fortunate than you, etc). Religion didn't play a part in either.

How is a persons moral judgement defined ? How would a parameter be set without some sort of moral guide lines ? I think there has to be a guideline of sorts and that guideline would I think come through both spiritual and physical belief.....
Add Comment
From_the_east

No you are not a "sinner" if you are without a religion. But without one what meters you morality?

-- Posted By eastwind on September 14, 2007

Can anyone truly tell me what is moral and what is not without a religion. Whatever you say, its still just YOUR opinion what is right and what is wrong. What is right to one person is wrong to another. With religion, that isn't an issue.

Rss RSS