Sex: Is it better 'dirty' or 'clean'?

You know you've thought about it; raunchy, screaming orgies and lascivious carnality. But what's better? That or wholesome, tender lovemaking with someone you're in love with?

Posted By Jake_the_Mad on September 12, 2007

You can subscribe to this Debate if you log in.

About Jake_the_Mad

Bio? Whadya want me to say here, that I'm a guy, I like pizza and I'm a social psychologist?

Top Enemies: none
Person_60

Seems apples and oranges are being compared here,

Posted By primus on September 23, 2007

Image1

I think there's plenty of room for "making love" and for dirty, rauncy "...

Posted By themonk on September 17, 2007

Call For Backup

Invite others to join and support you in this debate. Or maybe you just want to pick a fight! Either way...

Call for backup now!

Give me the dirt and pile on the raunch! Whooha!

Image1

I think there's plenty of room for "making love" and for dirty, rauncy "f...king"

-- Posted By themonk on September 17, 2007

There is a difference between sweetly, tenderly "making love" and passionately, no holes barred "f...king"...but both aspects of the act have their merits. Whatever turns you...and your partner on is great!

They used to say "different strokes for different folks" and "variety is the spice of life". Sweet & tender once in awhile...sheet ripping no-holes-barred passion another.

Dirty is flirty, but 'clean' is sublime.

Person_60

Well...

-- Posted By emmmapeel82 on August 15, 2008

Clean. But only because I can't think of sex as "dirty." Probably because I was raised strictly non-religious.

Person_60

Seems apples and oranges are being compared here,

-- Posted By primus on September 23, 2007

1 can love and not have sex (as with your kids) or have sex and not love (as with your hand)...

Rss RSS