New World Order: Clash of Civilizations or Dialogue of Civilizations?
After the Cold War Era, Samuel P. Huntington predicted that cultural and religious reasons will be the new root of conflict. He was right when 9/11 happened. In 2001 UN however delegated a new term called the Dialogue of Civilizations. Which world or
Reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clash_of_Civilizations
Posted By perspectives on September 9, 2007
9/11 proved that conflict can know no political boundaries
Posted By perspectives on September 9, 2007
Call For Backup
Invite others to join and support you in this debate. Or maybe you just want to pick a fight! Either way...
Call for backup now!
Digg
Delicious
Reddit
Yahoo
Google
Stumbleupon
Clash of Civilization
There will always be a certain struggle between opposing forces that can only end in further conflict. That is how history is designed. The drive for a plural society and tolerance is in the best case a fallacy.
9/11 proved that conflict can know no political boundaries
-- Posted By perspectives on September 9, 2007What is terrorism for us could be a manifestation of the strife that is deeply rooted on the clash between Islam on one side and Christianity on the other. The events at 9/11 shows that the status quo can be replaced by borderless conflicts. The events at 9/11 is the reality of international affairs that can exist outside the formal structure. The fact that it can be jostled by some fundamentalist tells us that there are things outside the control of the current world system.
RSS
About perspectives