Should religious people attempt to convert others to their faith?

Should religious people attempt to convert others to their faith, or does it cause more problems/conflict than it's worth?

Posted By Jess on September 26, 2007

You can subscribe to this Debate if you log in.

About Jess

I'm a 24 year old Registered Nurse. :)

Top Enemies: none
From_the_east

If you KNEW that there was a God trying to reach out, would YOU sit idle?

Posted By eastwind on October 18, 2007

L_684f116ceb600ffaf044e0afa7831b0f

Spirituality should be personal.

Posted By jhall85 on September 27, 2007

Person_60

Why should anyone have the right to decide what's best for me?

Posted By johnwey on September 26, 2007

Sundrop2

Organized religion doesn't have to be a "sheep" following a leader type ...

Posted By Sundrop on October 2, 2007

Call For Backup

Invite others to join and support you in this debate. Or maybe you just want to pick a fight! Either way...

Call for backup now!

I'm just trying to show people the truth.

N1251707010_30210200_3493

Within reason.

-- Posted By iverson92 on August 12, 2009

I believe that religion should be able to offer an explanation of their beliefs as much as any other. But i do too believe that if i decline your offer to "show me the way" you should leave me alone.

Sundrop2

Organized religion doesn't have to be a "sheep" following a leader type of situation.

-- Posted By Sundrop on October 2, 2007

I agree with your statement, saying that sheep aren't really having a spiritual experience at all because they are not having personal contact with Deity. However there are many religions out there that insist personal revelation as a basis. .

Religion can help individuals make a one on one contact with God. However what usually happens is a mindless following just to satisfy personal anxiety. People are lazy, only a few care. Those who do go and met God on their own personal terms.

From_the_east

If you KNEW that there was a God trying to reach out, would YOU sit idle?

-- Posted By eastwind on October 18, 2007

The situation is fragile. True that if a person doesn't want any part of a religion they shouldn't be pestered into or about it. But if any caring human being know that there was a loving God out there, he or she would try to spread the message. .

I guess it depends if that individual was legit and KNEW divine things for REAL and for themselves first. If THAT is true, then spreading the truth is a logical and natural course of action. Blind followers in ANYTHING is illogical and idiotic.

Keep thine religion to thyself.

Obamanation

Deism

-- Posted By qbit on March 12, 2009

why hate religious people?

why hate atheists?

if it works for you, do it, as long as you dont impose it on me.

Supporting Links

Guinness_draught4

The unfortunate truth

-- Posted By Steviejeep on August 11, 2008

While I do not like to generalize, I do have a problem with uneducated Christians trying to covert me to their belief based on a book they don't understand. When I point out the historical inaccuracies, and the way that modern science, archiology, anthropology, and common sense all contradict what they believe, the answer I get most often is "you just have to have faith." This "don't ask questions, just believe" mentality is not good for society(see the dark ages). Also the history of Christianity is especially appalling, even for a religion. The Crusades, the Inquisitions, the Salem Witch Trials, all atrocities the were allowed to happen because of the "you have to have faith" mentality. This is not only a christian problem, any religion that demand you not question it's core values must have something to hide (like it's based on paganism, e.g. Christianity). The world will not know true peace until religion is removed from society, and all people except that furthering human kind is the only purpose for our existence, and the only afterlife is the memory we leave behind. We are heading toward a one world union, it's time to put aside our silly superstitious differences and do what's best for the human race as a whole. If you're spreading religion, you're furthering the cause of hate, and you are part of the problem. Maybe instead of "What would Jesus Do?" We should ask, "What should I do?"

First of all not all Christians are uneducated and christianity is not the only religion that you should address in your arguments. Secondly, three times as many wars contrary to what has been popularized in the public arena have been fought over territory! The inaccuracies you point to are welcomed in scripture as well as informed pastors and laymen alike. There exist the personnel responsibility of each christian believer and anyone that also checks into our faith to examined under a microscope all of these things! So you are right! it's not or ever has only been faith but facts as well. In the same way it is not about all facts either! Facts have there limits like faith because they can be manipulated or surpressed, even changed. Faith does not posses this weakness but 100% of the 106 billon people believe in something- that's faith! This is a solid faith that is most assuredly base on a foundation of facts and that's why many former atheist are devoted christians. But anyone who does like these people, independent research, unbiased or conclusive have seen the truth; no wonder Christ said " the truth shall make you free".
I agree with you on several points. First, not all christians are uneducated, many of them are quite brilliant people. I was only speaking of the one who don't know their own faith, yet persist in trying to convert me to a theology they don't understand. I always welcome intelligent argument and well founded debate on any topic, so please don't think of me as anti-christian, I'm much more anti-ignorance. And yes, Ignorance is not limited to any one religion, I have met more than my fair share of ignorant agnostics.
Secondly, I agree that facts, as they are presented to the public at large, cannot always be trusted. In every situation, it is every person's responsibility to examine the available information and make a educated decision. I have examined the available information on religion, and I have formed an educated opinion. I only wish that everyone else would do the same, rather than let themselves be threatened into believing what they are told. I have no problem with a person who has an educated opinion different than my own, I have a problem with those that go along, rather than think for themselves.
But i think you are missing the point all together. I don't care what you believe, I think there is a better use for your time and money than religion. As of 2003, there were 76.9 million Catholics in the United States alone. Now imagine if 76.9 million people volenteered one hour a week for the red cross. How fast could we have cleaned up after Hurricane Katrina? Imagine that 76.9 million people gave ten percent of their income to the United Nations World Food Project. How long would it take to end world hunger? Why are we as people wasting our time with silly fairy tales, trying to get into heaven, when we could be doing something good here on earth? And getting back to the original question, I think that to encourage involvement in such behavior is deplorable.
I know what you are thinking, "But religion does so much good in the world." Take a look at the numbers my friend, and when you see the small amount of good that religious organizations are doing, compared to the amount money that they take in, and the amount of influence they hold, you will begin to question what is going on. Live for this life, don't look for your morals in institutions, you know right from wrong, you don't need an ancient book to tell you.
Add Comment
L_684f116ceb600ffaf044e0afa7831b0f

Spirituality should be personal.

-- Posted By jhall85 on September 27, 2007

Instead of trying to get as many people as possible to see things your way, maybe people should start interpreting things on their own. My biggest problem with organized religion is the sheep mentality. I think many people don't even grasp their own religion, they just have a superficial, general understanding and connection with the people around them. Everyone is different so religion should mean something different to each individual. If there is a god then why does there have to be a middle man? If there is such thing then i think it would be ridiculous for people not to be in tune with him on their own without the support of a group or through the filter of an official. So much structure enables the majority to do what they do best. Follow and not question anything. Then it becomes more like Simon Says than a struggle for righteousness or spirituality. . With so much guidance it is easy for people to feed off the collective faith and let something so personal become just another petty social device. Because of this, i think the mindless, rapid expansion of an organized religion is convoluting most personal spiritual enhancement. Then again, even if it is nothing more than a support group, it has saved some people. .

Person_60

Why should anyone have the right to decide what's best for me?

-- Posted By johnwey on September 26, 2007

Most mainstream religions all worship the same god. Why is it important how people worship the same god?

Rss RSS