<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Your Right to Smoke .vs. My Right to Breath</title>
    <link>http://www.riledup.com/debate/110/your-right-to-smoke-vs-my-right-to-breath</link>
    <description>Smokers often force their nasty habit onto others who in turn are adversely affected against their will.  Children who live in a household where 2nd hand smoke harms them, unborn babies deformed or ill because of their smoking pregnant mothers, and p</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <item>
      <title>Smokers Should Be Considera... - It's not too much to ask that smokers confine their habit to places where others won't be affected.</title>
      <description>Most places have designated areas where people can smoke.  There is no need to foul up the air for people who choose not to smoke.  Non-smokers should have the uninhibited right to breathe non-smokey air.

</description>
      <author>Perdie</author>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 00:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.riledup.com/debate/110/your-right-to-smoke-vs-my-right-to-breath</link>
      <guid>http://www.riledup.com/debate/110/your-right-to-smoke-vs-my-right-to-breath</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Smokers Should Be Considera... - I'll give up smoking when YOU give up driving.</title>
      <description>All this b!^!hing about second hand smoke, but I don't see anyone banning cars.  The fact is, second hand car smoke is far worse and far more prevalent than cigarette smoke. Hypocrites. I want to walk down the street and not smell car fumes. Will that happen? Only when we run out of oil. .

</description>
      <author>macattack</author>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 04:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.riledup.com/debate/110/your-right-to-smoke-vs-my-right-to-breath</link>
      <guid>http://www.riledup.com/debate/110/your-right-to-smoke-vs-my-right-to-breath</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Smokers Should Be Considera... - Those who smoke should think before lighting up.</title>
      <description>I strongly feel that those who smoke have the right to smoke, but they do not have the right to afflict others with their destructive smoking habit.   It is simply inhuman and wrong for a pregnant mother to smoke her unborn child into mental r*#%#dation o

</description>
      <author>eastwind</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 02:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.riledup.com/debate/110/your-right-to-smoke-vs-my-right-to-breath</link>
      <guid>http://www.riledup.com/debate/110/your-right-to-smoke-vs-my-right-to-breath</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Smokers should be allowed t... - Yea, and I should be able to drive 120 mph any time I want.</title>
      <description>Many smokers may think (do they do that?) they should be able to smoke any time anywhere they want, but they want nothing to do with accepting the consequences.

How many smokers dump their automobile ashtrays in parking lots and sidewalks, or throw their butts anywhere they want?  How many care that their smoke might wreck my nice meal in a restaurant?

If many smokers have no regard for others' reasonable rights, how can they demand rights for themselves that are actually highly detrimental to others?

</description>
      <author>JayBird</author>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 14:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.riledup.com/debate/110/your-right-to-smoke-vs-my-right-to-breath</link>
      <guid>http://www.riledup.com/debate/110/your-right-to-smoke-vs-my-right-to-breath</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

