Right to impound parent's cars for 24 yr old son's drug bust?
Parents of a 24 yr old son (who was living at home) had both of their cars impounded by police b/c their son used them to sell drugs from. Is that fair?
Reference: http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2003891514_forfeit190.html
Posted By mama_k on September 19, 2007
Unless the parents encouraged and supported him in selling drugs, no way...
Posted By mama_k on September 19, 2007
Civil forfeiture, is in and of itself questionable in its legality and c...
Posted By nullpacket on September 20, 2007
If I recall under the law any vehicle involved in a drug related violati...
Posted By Pacific-Writer on September 19, 2007
If the car was used in the commission of a crime then it should be impou...
Posted By Perdie on September 20, 2007
Parents need to get the message that you can't ignore, ignore, or condone drug dealing children
If the car was used in the commission of a crime then it should be impounded.
-- Posted By Perdie on September 20, 2007But, if the parents kick their son out (with the option of medical treatment) and refuse to allow him back in the home or access to the cars, then they should get them back. It's the only fair compromise I can see.
If I recall under the law any vehicle involved in a drug related violation may be impounded. It's
-- Posted By Pacific-Writer on September 19, 2007a bad deal for the parents but tough. You can't tell me the parents had no idea their kid was an addict. .
The kid is 24 years old! There's no way the parents should be penalized like this.
Unless the parents encouraged and supported him in selling drugs, no way should they be punished!
-- Posted By mama_k on September 19, 2007According to the article, they had bought steering wheel locks. That shows they were trying to keep him away from their cars and should've been enough. Plus, he's been in jail four times in the past four months for drugs...why on earth is he out?! Isn't that the justice system's fault?!. Based on what the article says, I feel really bad for the parents. It states they didn't initially know he had drug problems, and now they're probably torn between having their child (even though he's an adult, he'll always be their child). out on the street or at least having him at home where they can possibly help him. I am all for parental responsibility, but this goes way too far.
Civil forfeiture, is in and of itself questionable in its legality and constitutionality.
-- Posted By nullpacket on September 20, 2007From the 5th Amendment of the US Constitution: "nor shall any person .. be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.".
The parents shouldn't have to pay for their 24 year old's mistakes.
-- Posted By Sundrop on October 12, 2007Let the perpetrator take the full blunt weight of the law not the parents. Its not his car, give the car back to the innocent parents.
.

Digg
Delicious
Reddit
Yahoo
Google
Stumbleupon
RSS
About mama_k
I consider myself a "Republi-cat" or a "Demo-can" 'cause frankly, both sides have their merit, and both drive me crazy. I'm the wife of one guy, mom of two girls, sister of three brothers & 2 SIL's...